|
At Sandstrom Consulting Services, our Litigation Technology
Support practice focuses on complex business and commercial litigation, with an emphasis on intellectual property, anti-trust,
and other complex litigation. We are known for energized dedication, thorough preparation, and mastery of presentation
detail. Sandstrom Consulting Services supports
intellectual property trials and complex litigation before numerous courts throughout the United States including California,
Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Guam, New Jersey, New York, and North Carolina. We are involved in technology
and matters such as pharmaceuticals, medical devices, genetically engineered plants, anti-trust, false advertising, and complex
commercial litigation. One of our most recent jury trial victories was a win for EarthLink, Inc. Working
with Mr. Jameson of Duane Morris, Sandstrom Consulting Services helped to obtain a complete jury verdict of non-infringement
and patent invalidity in the defense of a complex, multi-party patent litigation involving ADSL technology in the District
of Delaware. While working with Mr. James Quinn of the New York office of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Sandstrom Consulting
Services was part of another notable, high-profile jury trial victory(August 2006). A complete defense verdict for Johnson
& Johnson in a complex antitrust case tried in federal court in Santa Ana, California. The plaintiff, Applied Medical,
a small medical device manufacturer, claimed over $50 million (untrebled) in damages asserting that J&J had monopolized
the market for endoscopic medical products used in minimally invasive surgery by offering so-called bundled discounts with
other J&J products, particularly J&J’s market-leading future products. After a seven week trial, the nine person
jury rejected plaintiff’s claims of exclusionary conduct and upheld as lawful all of J&J’s nationwide contracting
practices with billions of dollars at stake. In June 2006, Mr. Sandstrom helped to win a complete victory for the UnitedHealth
Group when the federal district court in Miami granted summary judgment in the In re Managed Care Multidistrict Litigation,
a nationwide class action with plaintiffs seeking more than $13 billion. The other defendants had previously settled for
more than a billion dollars. December 2004; Working with the Wilmington Delaware Law firm of Connolly, Bove, Lodge
& Hutz, Mr. Sandstrom played a part in "The Mother Of All Patent Challenges" in the Ranbaxy v.
Pfizer litigation. The challenge was on the world's largest drug company's money-spinning blockbuster Lipitor.
Ranbaxy challenged Pfizer's atorvastatin, sold under the Lipitor brand name here in the US to gain access to the US cholesterol-lowering
medication market of more than $12 billion. Pfizer has multiple patents on the drug, the $70 billion victory for
Pfizer staves off generics up until 2010. Sandstrom Consulting Services: For
Over 10 years and billions of dollars in verdicts, we have been proven "in the courts." We are dependable,
innovative, and committed to helping you win your case.
|
